Challenge: Existing methods for summarization evaluation focus on a metric to represent the quality of the text, but they focus on only a few quality dimensions.
Approach: They analyze the depen-dencies between various quality dimensions on automatically created multi-document summaries and which are best suited for summarization.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves higher quality summaries than other methods on a large-scale heterogeneous data set.

Similar Papers

What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization? (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for text summarization have been investigated, but there are still gaps between them and human professionals.
Approach: They analyze 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarization models manually.
Outcome: Aiming to gain more understanding of summarization systems with respect to their strengths and limitations on a fine-grained syntactic and semantic level, we use 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarizing models.
How well do you know your summarization datasets? (2021.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: State-of-the-art summarization systems are trained on massive datasets scraped from the web.
Approach: They manually analyse 600 samples from three popular summarization datasets . they use a six-class typology which captures different noise types and degrees of summarizing difficulty.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better on large datasets than on the current models.
Re-Examining Summarization Evaluation across Multiple Quality Criteria (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a number of automated evaluation metrics are evaluated by multiple quality criteria, such as relevance, consistency, fluency and coherence.
Approach: They propose a method that removes the confounding variable and detects unreliable correlations.
Outcome: The proposed method detects unreliable correlations between QCs and human scores . it is based on a multi-QC setup, but it fails to detect summary corruptions .
Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Automated evaluation metrics are an essential part of the development of text-generation tasks such as summarization.
Approach: They propose to use top-scoring system outputs to assess the reliability of automatic evaluation metrics for text summarization.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation method is based on human judgments from 25 top-scoring neural summarization systems.
Re-Examining System-Level Correlations of Automatic Summarization Evaluation Metrics (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing definitions of system-level correlations are inconsistent with how they are used to evaluate systems.
Approach: They propose to calculate correlations only on pairs of systems separated by small differences in automatic scores . they propose to use the full test set instead of the subset of summaries judged by humans .
Outcome: The proposed changes improve the accuracy of the estimated correlations on pairs of systems separated by small differences in automatic scores.
Automated Metrics for Medical Multi-Document Summarization Disagree with Human Evaluations (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work has shown that models may exploit shortcuts that are difficult to detect using standard n-gram similarity metrics such as ROUGE.
Approach: They propose to use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences to improve MDS evaluation methods.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve the quality of literature review summarization models . they use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences .
Studying Summarization Evaluation Metrics in the Appropriate Scoring Range (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics are compared based on their ability to correlate with humans, but they disagree in the higher-scoring range in which current systems operate.
Approach: They show that evaluation metrics which behave similarly on these datasets strongly disagree in the higher-scoring range in which current systems operate.
Outcome: The evaluation metrics which behave similarly on these datasets strongly disagree in the higher-scoring range in which current systems operate.
How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluation (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to evaluate summary coherence are often evaluated using disparate datasets and metrics.
Approach: They propose to use automatic evaluation to evaluate coherence of summaries by selecting high-scoring candidates.
Outcome: The proposed methods show that they can perform better on an even playing field.
Re-Evaluating Evaluation for Multilingual Summarization (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that automated evaluation approaches correlate with human ratings in English, but this is unclear for other languages.
Approach: They construct a small-scale pilot dataset containing article-summary pairs and human ratings in English, Chinese and Indonesian to measure the strength of summaries.
Outcome: The results show that standard metrics are unreliable measures of quality in Chinese and Indonesian.
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments .
Approach: They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations