Evaluation of Off-the-shelf Speech Recognizers Across Diverse Dialogue Domains (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated off-the-shelf automatic speech recognition systems . current state-of-the art systems perform poorly in domains that require special vocabulary and language models . |
| Approach: | They evaluate off-the-shelf automatic speech recognition systems across different dialogue domains . they use data collected from deployed spoken dialogue systems and human-human conversations . |
| Outcome: | The evaluation is aimed at non-experts with limited experience in speech recognition . the results show that the performance of each speech recognizer can vary significantly depending on the domain . |
Similar Papers
Evaluation of Off-the-shelf Speech Recognizers on Different Accents in a Dialogue Domain (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automatic speech recognition systems for non-American accents have a much higher error rate than for general american accents. |
| Approach: | They evaluate automatic speech recognition systems on agent-directed speech . they find that the performance is worse for non-American accents than for General American . |
| Outcome: | The ASR systems perform worse for non-American accents than for General American accents . the results suggest that training on non-native English speakers is needed to narrow the performance gap. |
Evaluating Open-Source ASR Systems: Performance Across Diverse Audio Conditions and Error Correction Methods (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated speech recognition (ASR) systems are able to transcribe spontaneous human conversations with high accuracy. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the accuracy of open source automatic speech recognition systems across conversational speech datasets and explore the potential of ASR ensembling and post-ASR correction methods to improve transcription accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods highlight the need for robust error correction techniques and address demographic biases to enhance ASR performance and inclusivity. |
A Survey of Multilingual Models for Automatic Speech Recognition (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems have achieved human-like performance for a few languages, but the majority of the world’s languages do not have usable systems due to the lack of large speech datasets to train these models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use unlabeled speech data to build multilingual ASR models that can be used for improved performance on low-resource languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to improve performance on low-resource languages by using unlabeled speech data. |
An (unhelpful) guide to selecting the best ASR architecture for your under-resourced language (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | English ASR now has word error rates comparable to that of human transcriptionists, but only for the handful of the world's 7000 languages with abundant training resources. |
| Approach: | They propose to use four of the most popular ASR toolkits to train ASR models for eleven languages with limited ASR training resources: eleven widely spoken languages of Africa, Asia, and South America, one endangered language of Central America, and three critically endangered languages of North America. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms four of the most popular ASR toolkits for eleven languages with limited training resources. |
CEASR: A Corpus for Evaluating Automatic Speech Recognition (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
Malgorzata Anna Ulasik, Manuela Hürlimann, Fabian Germann, Esin Gedik, Fernando Benites, Mark Cieliebak
| Challenge: | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems are increasingly needed for research and practical applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to use public speech corpora to evaluate the quality of automatic speech recognition (ASR) they calculate an average Word Error Rate (WER) per corpus, per system and per corpor-system pair . |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus evaluates the quality of automatic speech recognition systems using public speech corpora and transcripts generated by state-of-the-art systems. |
Discourse on ASR Measurement: Introducing the ARPOCA Assessment Tool (2022.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated speech recognition (ASR) models are based on a corpus of audio recordings, but are often small or nonexistent for less common languages and dialects. |
| Approach: | This research proposal will develop a semi-automatic acoustic features extraction system that integrates phonetic transcripts with pronunciation dictionaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system will be used to improve language recognition and model feedback in less common languages and dialects. |
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Incremental Speech Recognition and Diarization for Conversational AI (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems are increasingly powerful and more numerous with several options existing as a service. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the most popular automatic speech recognition systems with metrics and experiments designed with these standards in mind. |
| Outcome: | The most popular ASR systems are Microsoft and IBM, and none are suitable for natural spontaneous conversations in real-time. |
Using Automatic Speech Recognition in Spoken Corpus Curation (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is a new way to make audio-visual data accessible. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic speech recognition (ASR) to make audio-visual data accessible by systematic queries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system has higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for south of the country. |
Fairness in Automatic Speech Recognition Isn’t a One-Size-Fits-All (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained speech models like Whisper exhibit inconsistent group-level performance that varies across domains. |
| Approach: | They fine-tune a Whisper model on the Fair-Speech corpus using basic fine- tuning, demographic rebalancing, gender-swapped data augmentation and a novel contrastive learning objective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves stable, cross-domain fairness improvements without changes to the training data distribution and with minimal accuracy trade-offs. |
WER We Stand: Benchmarking Urdu ASR Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This paper analyzes the performance of three ASR models for low-resource languages like Urdu . low-rural languages like urdu have significant gaps in accuracy and reliability . |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of three ASR models: Whisper, MMS, and Seamless-M4T . they present the first conversational speech dataset for benchmarking Urdu ASR systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model families outperform Whisper, MMS, and Seamless-M4T on two types of speech datasets. |