Structural Supervision Improves Few-Shot Learning and Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have not investigated the relationship between a token's frequency in the training corpus and syntactic properties models learn about it. |
| Approach: | They develop controlled experiments that probe models’ syntactic nominal number and verbal argument structure generalizations for tokens seen as few as two times during training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can make syntactic generalizations for tokens seen as few as two times during training and transfer them to transformed contexts. |
Similar Papers
A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on syntactic knowledge models has not provided a clear picture of the properties required to produce proper syntaktic generalizations. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate syntactic knowledge of language models by varying model architectures . they find substantial differences in syntaktic generalization performance by model architecture . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model architectures outperform other architectures on a set of 34 English-language syntactic test suites. |
Structural Supervision Improves Learning of Non-Local Grammatical Dependencies (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art LSTM language models learn sequential contingencies with some success . LS models fail to learn other non-local grammatical dependencies, however . |
| Approach: | They compare LSTM language models with RNNGs to examine grammatical dependencies . they find that hierarchical supervision improves learning of non-local dependencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the existing model on non-local dependencies and learns many of the Island Constraints on the filler-gap dependency. |
Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language? (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the success of language models using neural networks, it remains unclear to what extent neural models have the generalization ability to perform inferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate whether neural models can learn systematicity of monotonicity inference in natural language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that neural models can perform inferences on unseen combinations of lexical and logical phenomena when syntactic structures are similar between training and test sets. |
Controlled Evaluation of Grammatical Knowledge in Mandarin Chinese Language Models (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that structural supervision helps English language models learn generalizations about syntactic phenomena such as subject-verb agreement. |
| Approach: | They train LSTMs, Recurrent Neural Network Grammars, Transformer language models, and Transformer-parameterized generative parsing models on Mandarin Chinese datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models learn aspects of Mandarin Chinese grammar that assess syntactic and semantic relationships. |
Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on compositional generalization with semantic parsing, but it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization. |
| Approach: | They construct a machine translation dataset that measures compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model struggle more in structural generalization than in compositional generalization. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Compositional Generalization by Factorizing Alignment and Translation (2020.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a crucial property underlying the expressive power of human language is its systematicity. |
| Approach: | They propose to make an analogous separation between alignment and translation in neural machine translation to capture compositional structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms existing neural networks on a compositional generalization task without supervision. |
LSTMs Can Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies Well, But Modeling Structure Makes Them Better (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study found that language models fail to learn long-range syntax sensitive dependencies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a subject-verb agreement diagnostic to determine whether language models can learn long-range syntax sensitive dependencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms left-corner and bottom-up variants in learning non-local dependencies. |
Does BERT really agree ? Fine-grained Analysis of Lexical Dependence on a Syntactic Task (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lexically-independent subject-verb number agreement (NA) is performed by transformer-based neural language models (NLMs) . but when as little as one attractor is present, the model fails to perform lexical generalization . |
| Approach: | They propose to disrupt lexical patterns found in naturally occurring stimuli for each targeted structure in a novel fine-grained analysis of BERT's behavior. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generalizes well for simple templates, but fails to perform lexically-independent generalization when as little as one attractor is present. |
How to Plant Trees in Language Models: Data and Architectural Effects on the Emergence of Syntactic Inductive Biases (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study found that pre-training can teach language models to rely on hierarchical syntactic features . aaron ramirez: we find that pretraining on simpler language induces a hierarchic bias . |
| Approach: | They find that pre-training can teach language models to rely on hierarchical syntactic features . authors: this suggests that in cognitively plausible language acquisition settings, models may be more data-efficient . |
| Outcome: | a recent study shows that pre-training can teach language models to rely on hierarchical features . the findings suggest that in plausible language acquisition settings, language models may be more data-efficient than previously thought . |