DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-Checking (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Christopher Hidey, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Tariq Alhindi, Siddharth Varia, Kriste Krstovski, Mona Diab, Smaranda Muresan
| Challenge: | Fact Extraction and Verification datasets provide a resource for end-to-end fact-checking, requiring retrieval of evidence from Wikipedia to validate a veracity prediction. |
| Approach: | They propose a system that is resilient to attacks by multiple propositions, temporal reasoning, ambiguity and lexical variation and a sequence of evidence sentences and veracity relation predictions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is resilient to three realistic “attacks” and obtains state-of-the-art results due to improved evidence retrieval. |
Similar Papers
FEVER: a Large-scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | 185,445 claims generated by altering sentences from Wikipedia are verified without knowledge of the sentence they were derived from. |
| Approach: | They propose a publicly available dataset for verification against textual sources, FEVER: Fact Extraction and VERification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset achieves 31.87% accuracy on labeling a claim accompanied by the correct evidence, compared to 50.91% if we ignore the evidence. |
Constrained Fact Verification for FEVER (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fact verification rely on extracted evidence, but there is little work on understanding the reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that enforces a closed-world reliance on extracted evidence to verify a claim's factuality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on the FEVER shared task and shows that it is more accurate than previous models. |
The FEVER2.0 Shared Task (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing deep neural models are becoming more complex and difficult to understand and characterize their behaviour. |
| Approach: | They present the results of the second Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER2.0) Shared Task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task was based on the second Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER2.0) shared task. |
EX-FEVER: A Dataset for Multi-hop Explainable Fact Verification (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on fact verification lack a high-quality dataset for explainability . existing systems lack evidence retrieval and veracity prediction, limiting the ability to verify a claim . |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for multi-hop explainable fact verification that summarises and modifies Wikipedia documents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset aims to improve the accuracy of multi-hop explainable fact verification systems. |
Team DOMLIN: Exploiting Evidence Enhancement for the FEVER Shared Task (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods of fact checking are based on the assignment of a truth value to a given (factual) statement, and therefore it is desirable to have access to the evidence used to reach an assignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-staged sentence selection strategy to account for examples in the dataset where evidence is not only conditioned on the claim, but also on previously retrieved evidence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system beats the top performing systems of the first FEVER challenge which act as a baseline, beating 64.21% of the top-performing systems. |
Evaluating adversarial attacks against multiple fact verification systems (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated fact verification is progressing due to advances in modeling and availability of large datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose two scoring metrics which take into account the correctness of adversarial instances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method and paraphrasing method have higher potency and higher resilience than baselines. |
FEVER Breaker’s Run of Team NbAuzDrLqg (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In the second workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification, the goal is to develop a fact-check system which can resolve "fake news" and misinformation problems. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a model to retrieve evidence when appropriate query terms could not be easily generated from the claim. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models were able to get both the evidence and label correct in 20% of the data. |
Exploring Listwise Evidence Reasoning with T5 for Fact Verification (2021.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fact verification use pretrained sequence-to-sequence transformers for sentence selection and label prediction. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for fact verification that leverages pretrained sequence-to-sequence transformer models for sentence selection and label prediction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework scores higher than the second place approach on the blind test set . the proposed framework can be useful for a broader range of NLP tasks, the authors say . |
A Multi-Level Attention Model for Evidence-Based Fact Checking (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent state-of-the-art approaches have developed increasingly sophisticated models based on graph structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a simple model that can be trained on sequence structures and can benefit from joint training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the graph-based models on a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification. |
Extract and Aggregate: A Novel Domain-Independent Approach to Factual Data Verification (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to verify information are used to verify factual data . a domain-independent fact checking system can solve the problem entirely or at the individual stages. |
| Approach: | They propose a domain-independent fact checking system that can solve the verification problem entirely or at the individual stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can achieve a score on par with state-of-the-art models based on specific datasets . it can be used to verify the truth or falsity of the fact, the authors say . |